Child Abuse and Child Protection Services Agencies – Part I

Most child abuse allegations coming into the Child Protection Services (CPS) on Long Island and Association for Child Services (ACS) in the City of New York come in by anonymous phone calls on child abuse hotlines. On a national basis, about 3.5 million reports of child abuse are made each and every year. Child protection agencies are supposed to sort out which of the claims being made are credible and which are phony or trivial. The large majority of states have a screening process to determine which claims of child abuse should be followed up and which should be ignored.

Child protection agencies have the job of seeing to it children are protected. However, what child protection agencies shouldn’t do is intervene in the private lives of families where there is actually no child abuse. Unfortunately, in the State of New York, child abuse investigative agencies err on the side of caution in almost all cases. Part of the reason for the overly aggressive behavior of child abuse investigators has to do with the fact that they are forced to make significant decisions regarding the health and welfare of children with limited information being provided to them.

Child Abuse Investigations

Upon receiving information about an alleged case of child abuse or neglect, the child protection agency may start an investigation, assign a social worker to look into the family circumstances, suggest counseling to families, and/or bring a proceeding in the Family Court in the State of New York for child abuse or child neglect. These proceedings can result in the removal of the child from the custody of the parent.

The issue that investigators and social workers for child protection agencies have is determining whether parents are mistreating their children or is this a situation where the parents are just trying to do the right thing.

father's advocateElliot S. Schlissel is a father’s rights lawyer. His law firm protects parents from improper findings of child abuse and child neglect.

Parental Alienation

father's rights lawyerParental alienation is a problem that sometimes exists in divorce cases, in the Supreme Court, and custody and parenting time (visitation) cases in Family Courts. Parental alienation is a problem parents, attorneys, and judges deal with within the context of the legal system. Unfortunately, it is a problem without an adequate remedy. In numerous cases of parental alienation, the only successful remedy is changing the custody from the alienating parent to the alienated parent. While in theory this seems like a good idea, sometimes the children are so alienated they refuse to live with and cooperate with the alienated parent. Unfortunately, in many cases the attorney for the child hears from the child that he or she hates the alienated parent and does not want to live with him or her.

The attorney for the child, under the current court rules, is forced to take the position of the child and argue the parent who denigrated the other parent should receive custody of the child or children. This action by the attorney for the children has an impact on the judge. When judges hear children do not want to live with one parent or favor the other parent, they have a tendency to go along with the children’s position.

Parental Alienation Syndrome

Parental Alienation Syndrome is a psychological malady where one parent brain washes the children so they view the other parent with hostility. The alienating parent manipulates the children to the point they lack respect and sometimes fear the other parent who loves them. The children are turned against one parent by the other without a basis in fact or real circumstances. This, unfortunately, takes place within purview of custody and visitation litigation in the courts of New York.

The Parent Involved in Parental Alienation

The parent who has alienated the children from the other parent takes this action for selfish, self-centered reasons. This parent loses sight of what is in the children’s best interest. This parent engages in the process of denigrating the other parent to the point the children believe the other parent doesn’t love them. There is a controlling aspect by the alienating parent over the children.

What Alienated Parents Must Do

The alienated parent must refresh the children’s recollection with regard to happy times and loving situations involving this parent and the children. The alienated parent must continually remind the children how he or she loves them. The alienated parent, if he or she is consistent, shows love and affection to the children during every visit, will be able to reclaim the love, affection and good will of their children.

Conclusion

Parental alienation is a major problem in the Family Courts and in the Supreme Courts concerning custody and visitation proceedings. Judges sometimes do not take the problem of one parent alienating another seriously enough. Judges should move quickly to admonish the alienating parent to cease and desist from this type of behavior. The alienating parent should be warned if they continue this behavior, the court will remove custody from him or her and limit access to the children to supervised visitation.advocate for parents rights

Knowledge of Order of Protection Sufficient Even When Service Was Improper

father's rights attorneyIn a case before Judge John Hecht, sitting in the Criminal Court of Kings County, he was presented with a situation where an Order of Protection, initially granted in the Family Court, was improperly served on man named Jakubowski. The service of the Order of Protection was made by the party who sought to be protected by the Order of Protection. This was in violation of the service of the Order of Protection requirements.

Violation of Stay Away Order of Protection

Criminal charges were brought against Jakubowski. He was charged with criminal contempt and harassment. The criminal complaint alleged that he had made a gesture indicating a throat slashing with his fingers which was in violation of the stay away Order of Protection granted by the Family Court. Defendant, Jakubowski, moved in Criminal Court to dismiss the proceeding based on facial insufficiency. His attorney claimed he did not have knowledge of the Order of Protection because it was served by a party in violation of the service requirements concerning an Order of Protection. Jakubowski’s attorney argued his client’s alleged improper throat slashing gesture did not amount to a threat of harm under §240-26(1) of the New York State Penal Law.

Knowledge of Order of Protection Enough

Judge Hecht, in his decision, stated the issue concerning the Order of Protection was whether or not Jakubowski had notice of its existence. The Judge’s decision was since Jakubowski had actual notice of the existence of the Order of Protection, even though it was improperly served, the criminal contempt allegation was valid. The Court took the position Jakubowski had knowledge of the existence of the Order of Protection and he intentionally disobeyed it. Even though the statute concerning the Order of Protection was not complied with due to the manner of the service, the actual knowledge of the existence of the Order of Protection by Jakubowski was sufficient to satisfy the allegations he had committed criminal contempt by violating the Order of Protection. The court also denied Jakubowski’s application to dismiss the harassment charge for facial insufficiency.

Conclusion

In the event an Order of Protection is taken out against you, and you become aware of the existence of the Order of Protection, you need to comply with its requirements. This is true even in the event it is not properly served upon you.

advocate for fathersElliot Schlissel is a father’s rights attorney representing fathers concerning Orders of Protection, child support, child visitation (parenting right issues), and all other issues concerning divorce and in Family Court proceedings.

Mother Loses Custody: She Interfered with Father’s Visitation

father's rights lawyersIn a recent decision, the Appellate Division of the Third Department (an upstate Appeals Court) found a mother who “clearly attempted to thwart and frustrate the father’s visitation” lost custody of her child. This case involves a mother who is a graduate of Cornell Law School, and a father who is an assistant professor of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering at Cornell University.

The mother and father were married for a brief period of time and had a child. A decision was initially made by the trial court judge giving the father custody because the mother had violated a joint custody separation agreement that had been incorporated into a Judgment of Divorce. This agreement had given the mother physical custody of the child and the father parenting time (visitation with the child). The agreement specifically prohibited either the mother or the father from relocating without the consent of the other party or the court.

Mother Relocates

Shortly after entering into the joint custody separation agreement, the mother accepted a job in New Jersey. She relocated with her son over the father’s objections. After a court hearing, the Supreme Court Judge awarded sole custody of the parties’ son, Ethan, to the father.

The court in its decision stressed a party seeking to relocate has the burden of showing the relocation is in the child’s best interest. The mother claimed she took the only job she had been offered. This had forced her to relocate. The Court in its decision stated, “the record amply supports the conclusion that the mother was not entirely willing to include the father in decisions regarding the child.” The mother had acted hostile to the father when the parties exchanged the child.

Conclusion

Relocating a child is not as simple as most parents believe it is. The court will take into consideration the impact the relocation of a child will have on the parenting time (visitation with the child) of the other parent. When moving, the residential custodial parent should obtain consent of the other parent or bring an application to the Family Court or the Supreme Court and obtain a Court Order authorizing the relocation.

helping fathers with custody issuesElliot S. Schlissel is a father’s rights attorney representing fathers in child custody cases, regarding visitation problems and parenting time issues throughout the metropolitan New York area.

The Difference Between Biology and Law

Paternity can be a difficult issue and can have life-changing effects if not properly established and accepted. Obviously every child has a biological father, however, if a child is born to two unwed partners, that child is defined as not having a legal father. This means that no man has any legal rights or responsibilities when it comes to the child and the child may ultimately suffer by not having the same benefits and rights as children of a married couple.  In order for the child and father to receive these rights the paternity must be established.  There are two ways that an unmarried partnership can establish paternity: first, the father can volunteer to sign an Acknowledgment of Paternity form or secondly, both parties can apply to the court to determine paternity. These and other paternity matters, including child support issues can be dealt with at a good family law firm.

The Child’s Birth – And What Men Should Know

When a child is born, the mother’s husband is automatically that child’s father in the eyes of the law, unless a court determines otherwise. The legal process to determine another father for the child outside of the marriage will usually include a court hearing, whereby the mother, her husband and – often – the biological father of the child will give their evidence or written testimony establishing the facts of the case. DNA tests are often included in these court hearings. Such proceedings are quite straightforward, and can be handled very efficiently by a good family law department. If, however, there’s a case of contested paternity, the court usually orders a genetic marker test – or a DNA test – to determine the paternity of a child. These cases can get a little messier: in its most basic form, the case itself indicates that the father does not believe himself the father of a child. In some cases, the mother may not be entirely sure of paternity and therefore all parties require a DNA test to establish whose responsibility the child is. These issues can become very heated between parties – but are quickly determined by the DNA test, so long as everyone agrees peacefully to follow this genetic marker route.

Rights of a Father Before Birth

An obvious ethical and legal question is: at what point does a father become the father of a child? This is part of a much larger question: when does a life become a life? That we won’t delve into here. However, since abortion is a highly contentious topic at the best of times – with pro-lifers and pro-choice campaigners never agreeing on when a life begins, nor whether the rights of a baby begin at time of birth or earlier – we can see that paternity issues only exacerbate these issues. Naturally, views on abortion – and certainly the question of who has a right to decide whether an abortion can be carried out – are further complicated when there is argument over the unborn child’s paternity. At the moment, the law states that the decision to abort rests with the mother but it’s a generally contentious issue. If anything ever did change, there are fears that if fathers are granted the ability to deny a woman the right to abort a fetus, perhaps this power would extend further: could it extend (or at least have implications for) her choice of birth control or access to emergency birth control? As Kwik Med states, “the main ethical objection to Emergency Contraception (EC) is that it is a form of abortion. These objections hinge on the definition of when pregnancy begins. The most common scientific view is that pregnancy begins when the embryo becomes embedded in the uterus, while, for most objectors, it is at the point of conception. The latter view leads to the possibility that any method that potentially destroys the embryo can be seen as a form of abortion”. We see from this that the topic is a tangled and fascinating one, even without the difficulties of a contested paternity.

What’s The Future?

At the moment, legalities surrounding paternity are pretty clear cut: if a man signs an Acknowledgement of Paternity form at the hospital or shortly afterwards, there is no issue and he acknowledges himself as the child’s legal father. Also, if the unmarried couple decide to go to court to legally declare the child as belonging to both of them, the hearing is quite short and uncomplicated, simply involving an acknowledgement by both parties that this is the case. As we know, areas that will continue to gain much attention are the rights of fathers – particularly in abortion cases. Although at the moment, the law favors the female’s rights over her own body, (meaning that she need not seek permission from her partner in order to abort their baby) we can imagine that in the future – with more use of frozen embryos, for example – this view of the woman’s sole right over her body may be slightly altered. We can anticipate that this position will continue to be reviewed and debated – and this will no doubt prove to be a very hot topic over coming years.

This article was presented by a guest author, Melissa Johnson.

Wife Denied Temporary Spousal Maintenance

father's rights attorneysIn a divorce action pending in Westchester County, in the State of New York, a wife sought pendent lite spousal maintenance (temporary spousal maintenance). She requested all compensation paid by their company, A Management Corp. (AMC), to both the husband and wife be equal. In addition, she sought a temporary spousal maintenance (alimony) award in the divorce lawsuit.

The attorney for the husband opposed wife’s application. The husband claimed his wife voluntarily left the employment of AMC. He further stated even after she left she still was receiving her salary. While she was receiving a salary, he made payments for many of the marital expenses, including her cell phone and car insurance. The husband also alleged that although he had been paying the wife’s salary she had actually not worked for AMC for a period of four years.

Judge’s Ruling

Justice Linda Christopher, ruled the wife’s requests for temporary spousal support and requiring all compensation paid to her and her husband by AMC to be equal, was an unreasonable request. She took the position the relief the wife asked for was not authorized and not appropriate since wife did not have an active role in the company for four years. Judge Christopher stated the presumptive award for spousal maintenance was $9,824.60 annually. She also found this amount would be unjust and inappropriate. Her decision was there should be no temporary spousal maintenance award. The court took this action because the wife was still receiving a salary from AMC. She was able to support herself on this salary and she was still receiving voluntary payments from her husband to cover her expenses that were in excess of her salary.

Conclusion

protecting father's rightsYou can’t have your cake and eat it too!

Enforcing Rights of New Fathers

father's rights lawyerParental leave for the birth of new children should be for both mothers and fathers. Presently birth mothers are entitled to ten weeks of paid vacation leave upon giving birth. When men and women adopt children, both the man and the woman are entitled to parental leave. Unfortunately, if you are the biological father of the child, you are only entitled to two weeks of parental leave.

Biological Fathers Are Second Class Citizens

At a time when men and women have equal rights to custody and equal rights to parenting time (visitation with their children), it is time men have equal rights also to parental leave when they are fortunate enough to have child come into this world. Most employers do not provide parental leave for new fathers. In families where both the mother and father work, sometimes it is more practical for the father to stay home and take care of the newborn child than the mother. Currently there are no federal laws that prohibit discrimination against fathers who have the responsibilities of taking care of young children. Should it be considered sex discrimination if an employer provides paid leave for a mother to take care of a newborn child but doesn’t provide for paid leave for a father in the same situation?

Men Raising Children

Men taking responsibility to help raise a newborn child are acting outside of the normal gender roles for men and women. When a man takes time off from work to spend time with a newborn child it helps him bond with the child. To make a woman equal to a man in the workplace requires the man also be equal to the woman with regard to benefits and responsibilities.

advocating new father's rightsElliot S. Schlissel, Esq., is a father’s rights attorney. He has represented fathers for more than 45 years with regard to protecting father’s rights in divorces, custody and parenting time issues.

Joint Custody Does Not Relieve Both Parents From Paying Child Support

father's rights lawyerWhere the parents have joint or shared custody, involving each of the parents having equal time with the children, both parents are not relieved of their obligation to pay child support. Most parenting plans designate one parent as the primary residential custodial parent. This is necessary especially in Nassau and Suffolk Counties on Long Island. School districts will look to parenting plans and divorce settlement agreements to establish the primary residential location of the child. The reason for this is that school district want to know who will be responsible for providing schooling for the child or children.

Parent With Greater Income Pays Child Support

In the case of Bast v. Rostoff, the New York State Court of Appeals in 1998, dealt with the issue of an equally shared custody arrangement and obligations to pay child support. In this case both parents requested the court to have the other parent pay them child support. The Court of Appeals (the highest Court in New York State) ruled in shared custody situations, the parent with the greater earned income is by the very nature of earning more money than the other parent deemed to be the non-custodial parent for child support purposes. This causes the parent with the greater income to pay child support payments to the parent with the lesser income. This is an example of the expression “no good deed goes unpunished.” Work hard, get educated, get a good job, earn more money than your spouse, and even if you have 50% of the visitation you still have to pay child support!

custody and child support advocates for fathersThe father’s rights lawyers at the Law Office of Elliot S. Schlissel, represent fathers throughout the metropolitan New York area with regard to issues involving child support, custody and divorce.

Fathers Have the Same Rights in Custody Matters as Mothers

father's rights attorneysThe law in New York is gender neutral. Fathers currently have the same rights to have custody of their children as mothers, in Family Court custody proceedings as well as in the Supreme Court in divorce proceedings. For fathers to win custody cases they must carefully prepare their cases to assert their father’s rights. The area of father’s rights law is a growing area of the law in many states. Fathers who want to have an active role in their children’s lives need to be prepared to fight for their father’s rights. Father’s rights lawyers have an expertise in the presentation of custody cases on behalf of fathers.

Tender Years Doctrine

One of the doctrines utilized in the past that prevented fathers from obtaining custody of young children was the Tender Years Doctrine. This doctrine advocated mothers were better suited to provide the love and care for young children. The laws that currently exist in the State of New York are gender neutral. The law no longer recognizes mothers have any superior right to have custody of a child at any age. The standard as to who should receive custody of the child is based on the child’s best interest.

In making decisions in custody cases, courts review many relevant factors. They base their decision on what is in the best overall interest of the child. Although mothers still win more custody cases than fathers, fathers have made significant inroads in recent years in obtaining custody of children.

Joint Custody

Joint custody arrangements can be negotiated between the attorneys for the father and the mother. Joint custody arrangements involve the sharing by both parents of duties with regard to the raising of the children. Joint custody allows the children to be close with both parents and have the love and affection of both a father and a mother on a regular basis.

Parenting Time

The more modern term for visitation with children is referred to as parenting time. Today, parenting time plans (which used to be called visitation agreements) can be worked out to set up mutually agreeable visitation schedules that take into account the employment of both the father and mother, the needs of the children to attend school, see doctors and dentists, and the transportation issues involving the children participating in extra curricular activities in after school programs. Parenting schedules can be flexible to allow the parents to work out last minute changes in their employment schedules and unforeseen matters that prevent them from utilizing their time with the children.

Child Support

The parent who receives custody of the child is entitled to receive child support from the non-custodial parent. Even in joint custody situations, there is a residential custodial parent designated in the parenting agreement. The non-residential custodial parent must pay child support to the residential custodial parent.

Conclusion

The best way to evaluate your situation is to contact an attorney that handles father’s rights cases to discuss the feasibility of your goals and to obtain a road map as to how to achieve those goals.advocate for fathers

Custody Changed Where Mother Alienated Children Against Father

father's rights lawyerReferee Dean Richardson-Mendelson, sitting in the Family Court of Rockland County, recently had a very disturbing case presented to him involving parental alienation of three children by a mother against their father. In this case, the father sought to modify a previously entered Judgment of Divorce. The settlement in the divorce case had granted both the mother and the father joint legal custody of the parties’ three children. The father now sought sole legal custody and sole physical custody of all three children due to the mother’s relentless program of parental alienation of the three children against the father.

Father’s Parenting Time in the Judgment of Divorce

In the original Judgment of Divorce the father was granted parenting time on alternating weekends. In addition he had two dinner visits with the children during the week. Pursuant to the Judgment of Divorce the father had parenting time on alternating holidays in addition to the standard weekly visitation.

Court Grants Sole Legal Custody and Physical Custody to Father

Referee Dean Richardson-Mendelson found the mother had systematically over a period of time, engaged in parental alienation of the children. Her actions were of such a nature to prevent the father from having a relationship with his children. Referee Richardson-Mendelson found the mother’s actions were systematic and designed to sabotage the father’s relationship with his children.

The Court noted in its decision the children maintained a negative view of the father that was not related to the actual reality of the parental situation between the father and the children. He further found the distortion in the relationship between the children and the father was caused by the mother’s relentless campaign of negatively influencing the children against the father. The court ordered a change in custody of two of the three children. Unfortunately, the court found that the third child was so indoctrinated by the mother to hate her father, he was concerned that she would run away.

parental alienation assistanceElliot S. Schlissel is a father’s rights lawyer representing fathers throughout the metropolitan New York area for more than 45 years with regard to custody, visitation and divorce related issues.